Skip to content

Marketers are much more likely to track engagement rate than efficiency metrics, with engagement monitored by 91% but EMV per working spend tracked by only 9%

Performance measurement


KPITracked by (%)
Engagement rate (likes, comments, shares) — How many people interacted91%
Impressions / reach (How many people saw it)84%
Click-through rate (How many people clicked)78%
Sales / revenue attribution (Whether people bought)72%
Customer acquisition cost (CAC) — What each customer cost72%
Return on ad spend (ROAS) — Revenue per dollar spent66%
Positive / negative sentiment (Whether people liked it)56%
Brand lift (awareness, consideration) — Whether perceptions shifted47%
Earned media value (EMV) — What the coverage was worth44%
Search volume uplift (Whether people searched)44%
EMV per working spend (efficiency ratio) — Whether the spend was efficient9%

Share of marketers tracking each influencer campaign KPI (%)

Reader Note:
There is a strong preference for activity over efficiency metrics.
Evidence:
Self-reported behaviour
Vendor interest:
Moderate — This comes from a company with a commercial interest in this market, so it is not a neutral source.
Sample:
Survey of 41 senior influencer marketing practitioners; sample skewed toward agencies and consultants (63% combined), with minimal brand-side representation (2%).

Good for

A rough sense of size and direction, and deciding what to look at first.

Not for

  • Exact numbers, or saying that one thing caused another.
  • The source never says when this data was collected. It could be considerably older than the publication date suggests.
  • This comes from a company with a commercial interest in this market, so it is not a neutral source.
  • The source says how much it looked at, but not how any of it was chosen.

Coming soon

This feature isn’t available yet.