Skip to content
Vendor reportCassandra, 2025

Google’s own attribution credited 2 to 5 times more revenue to ads than marketing mix models did

Performance measurement


2 to 5x

higher platform-reported ROAS ran than MMM-attributed outcomes in Cassandra's dataset, depending on channel

Reader Note:
Platform ROAS counts all revenue from people who clicked an ad. A marketing mix model tries to count only the revenue the ads actually caused. Cassandra, which sells MMM software, says the gap between the two ranged from 2x to 5x depending on channel. It doesn’t publish the per-channel ratios or how they were calculated. The dataset covers 253 models from 59 advertisers and $383M in spend in 2023–2025.
Evidence:
Modelled / projected
Vendor interest:
High — This comes from a company with a commercial interest in this market, so it is not a neutral source.
Sample:
253 revenue-outcome marketing mix models from 59 unique advertisers, covering $383M in media spend; data spans 2023-2025. Each record is one channel from one model run.

Good for

Planning with a rough expectation, and sanity-checking your own assumptions.

Not for

  • Reporting as what happened. This is what a model expects, not what anyone counted.
  • This comes from a company with a commercial interest in this market, so it is not a neutral source.
  • Nobody counted this directly — it's a calculation. The publisher worked it out itself, or took the ad platform's word for what its ads achieved.
  • This is an aggregated or average number that covers very different cases. Real results in a particular segment may differ.
  • The source never says how this number was measured.
  • The source says how much it looked at, but not how any of it was chosen.

Coming soon

This feature isn’t available yet.