Skip to content

45% of buyers call comparing AI-driven versus traditional customer journeys their top measurement hurdle

Performance measurement



Measurement challenges from conversational AI/agents

Measurement challenges from conversational AI/agents
ChallengeShare of respondents (%)
Comparing AI-driven vs. traditional customer journeys45%
Difficulty getting consistent, reliable visibility/citations data35%
Distinguishing legitimate agent activity from bots/fraud33%
Lack of internal expertise or resources32%
Lack of standardized reporting or measurement30%
Missing or unreliable AI referral data30%
Distinguishing human from legitimate agent activity28%
Limited visibility into consumer behavior/interactions25%
Reader Note:
45% picked this from a list of measurement challenges arising from conversational AI and agents, so it leads that list rather than being named by most buyers. The report's companion figure is that 86% are already changing measurement for the AI web or plan to, mainly by tracking brand visibility and citations inside AI tools. This is what buyers say is hard, not a count of how often anyone failed at it.
Evidence:
Stated intention
Vendor interest:
Moderate — This comes from a company with a commercial interest in this market, so it is not a neutral source.
Sample:
Email survey of 211 U.S. buy-side ad investment decision-makers, primarily at agencies (52%) and brands (44%); fielded July 17-31, 2026.

Good for

Reading the mood, and deciding what to test yourself.

Not for

  • Predicting what people will actually do. Intentions and behaviour come apart.
  • This comes from a company with a commercial interest in this market, so it is not a neutral source.
  • This was measured in one market. It may not hold where you are.
  • The source says how much it looked at, but not how any of it was chosen.

Coming soon

This feature isn’t available yet.