In B2B consultancy's LinkedIn marketing new followers might be the strongest lever, moving sales revenue and engagement more than website visits did
Performance measurement
| Response variable | Elasticity | Wear-in (week) | Wear-out (week) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | 0.59 | 0 | 1 |
| Followers | 0.88 | 0 | 1 |
| Sales Posts | — | — | — |
| Technical Posts | — | — | — |
| Social Posts | — | — | — |
| Engagement | 0.51 | 0 | 2 |
| Website Visits | 0.27 | 0 | 1 |
Social media marketing elasticities: response of sales, engagement & other metrics to a change in Followers (elasticity, wear-in/out weeks)
- Reader Note:
- Elasticities from one firm's weekly data, not rates to apply elsewhere: a 1% rise in new followers was associated with 0.591% higher sales revenue, 0.512% higher engagement and 0.274% more website visits, each appearing in the same week and fading within one to two weeks. For comparison, a 1% rise in website visits was associated with 0.356% higher sales. The authors warn that this firm sells services largely new to its market and may not represent more traditional B2B firms.
- Evidence:
- Observed behaviour
- Vendor interest:
- None
- Sample:
- One B2B consultancy firm operating mainly in Chile and Peru; 106 weeks of weekly firm-level data from February 2019 to March 2021, including 146 LinkedIn posts manually coded into sales, technical, or social categories.
Good for
Getting a rough orientation, and deciding what to check yourself.
Not for
- Saying that one thing caused another, or predicting what you would get.
- This was measured in one market. It may not hold where you are.
- The source talks about this as cause and effect — that is its reading, not a finding.
- This is one case — one company, one campaign, one account. Nothing implies it happens anywhere else.




