Vendor reportKantar, 2026
Talking about what the product does beats talking about how good it is: product benefits appear in 71% of creator videos and lift brand power by 18 points, while quality claims lift only 10
Briefing creators
| Message Type | Share of videos featuring this element (%) | Lift in Brand Power percentile (points) | Lift in Sales Power (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Product benefits communicated | 71% | 18 | 12% |
| Innovation | 23% | 19 | 10% |
| Demo of product function | 16% | 17 | 9% |
| Convenience | 45% | 15 | 9% |
| Versatility, adaptability | 17% | 14 | 8% |
| Quality | 45% | 10 | 7% |
Creator video elements: brand and sales lift — brand messaging themes
- Reader Note:
- The five messaging themes in the table: product benefits in 71% of videos for +18 Brand Power points and +12% Sales Power, innovation in 23% for +19 and +10, a demo of how the product works in 16% for +17 and +9, convenience in 45% for +15 and +9, and quality in 45% for +10 and +7. Innovation actually scores highest on brand lift, +19, a point above product benefits — but it appears in under a quarter of videos. So benefits lead on the combination of reach and effect rather than on effect alone. These are percentile points in Kantar's own predicted scores rather than measured outcomes.
- Evidence:
- Modelled / projected
- Vendor interest:
- High — This comes from a company with a commercial interest in this market, so it is not a neutral source.
- Sample:
- Analysis of 15,000+ pieces of sponsored creator content promoting products or brands across TikTok, Instagram, and YouTube; selection method not clearly disclosed.
Good for
Planning with a rough expectation, and sanity-checking your own assumptions.
Not for
- Reporting as what happened. This is what a model expects, not what anyone counted.
- This comes from a company with a commercial interest in this market, so it is not a neutral source.
- The source never says when this data was collected. It could be considerably older than the publication date suggests.
- Nobody counted this directly — it's a calculation. The publisher worked it out itself, or took the ad platform's word for what its ads achieved.
- The source never says how this number was measured.
- The source says how much it looked at, but not how any of it was chosen.




