Skip to content
Vendor reportSopro, 2026

Time-discounting bias (promising a near-term result) in cold email is linked to a 52.5% higher lead rate than baseline, the strongest of the message patterns tested

Cold outreach


52.5%

Lift in lead rate for cold emails that promise a fast, near-term result — the strongest-performing message pattern tested

Reader Note:
This comes from the send corpus rather than the decision-maker survey: Sopro compared the lead rate of emails carrying a given pattern against its own overall baseline. It is naturally occurring copy variation, not a randomised test, so emails promising a near-term result may differ from the rest in audience, offer or sender as well as in wording. The baseline itself is not published, so 52.5% is a relative figure with no absolute lead rate attached to it, and being the strongest pattern tested is a statement about the patterns Sopro chose to look at. Sopro sells the copywriting and prospecting services this points toward.
Evidence:
Quasi-experimental
Vendor interest:
High — This comes from a company with a commercial interest in this market, so it is not a neutral source.
Sample:
Survey: 442 senior B2B decision-makers (self-reported). Also draws on ~126M emails / 25M multichannel touchpoints and a 650,000-email 2025 send corpus for the message-pattern analysis, plus 2025 campaign benchmark data (lead rates by company size/industry).

Good for

Estimating which way an effect goes, and roughly how big, in similar situations.

Not for

  • Exact numbers, or situations unlike the one studied.
  • This comes from a company with a commercial interest in this market, so it is not a neutral source.
  • The two groups were not split at random — they picked their own side. The difference may have been there before anything was measured.
  • The source says how much it looked at, but not how any of it was chosen.

Coming soon

This feature isn’t available yet.