Vendor reportTriple Whale, 18 Aug 2026
Medical Devices & Supplies saw the highest year-over-year jump in conversion rate at 10.66% for Meta ads.
Channel validation
| Industry | Median conversion rate (%) | Change vs prior year (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Apparel & Accessories | 1.47% | 4.02% |
| Beauty | 1.79% | -10.45% |
| Home & Garden | 1.24% | -3.57% |
| Food & Beverage | 1.89% | -8.27% |
| Health & Wellness | 1.5% | -13.99% |
| Sports & Outdoors | 1.28% | 5.22% |
| Toys, Art, & Collectibles | 1.53% | 5.95% |
| Pets & Animals | 1.63% | -10.66% |
| Electronics | 1.13% | -15.69% |
| Lifestyle & Boutique | 1.62% | -8.38% |
| Baby | 1.82% | -5.29% |
| E-Learning & Online Courses | 1.31% | -23.29% |
| Books & Music | 1.69% | 2.1% |
| Media & Publishing | 1.51% | 1.22% |
| Travel Accessories & Luggage | 1.19% | -7.72% |
| Medical Devices & Supplies | 1.09% | 10.66% |
| Business Supplies & Equipment | 1.7% | -10.12% |
Median CVR and YoY change by industry (%)
- Reader Note:
- The only category to gain more than 6%, against Toys, Art & Collectibles at 5.95% and Sports & Outdoors at 5.22%, while eleven of the 17 fell. Read it with the level: at 1.09% this category has the lowest conversion rate in the table, so a 10.66% gain is a rise off the smallest base rather than a move to the front. What counts as a conversion is set by each brand's own tracking and is never defined in the report.
- Evidence:
- Observed behaviour
- Vendor interest:
- Moderate — This comes from a company with a commercial interest in this market, so it is not a neutral source.
- Sample:
- Performance data from over 40,000 brands using Triple Whale, covering Meta ads (Facebook and Instagram) and grouped into 17 ecommerce industry categories; selection details not disclosed.
Good for
Getting a rough orientation, and deciding what to check yourself.
Not for
- Saying that one thing caused another, or predicting what you would get.
- This comes from a company with a commercial interest in this market, so it is not a neutral source.
- This is an aggregated or average number that covers very different cases. Real results in a particular segment may differ.
- Nobody counted this directly — it's a calculation. The publisher worked it out itself, or took the ad platform's word for what its ads achieved.
- This result turned up while the researchers were searching the data. It has not been tested a second time.
- The source says how much it looked at, but not how any of it was chosen.




