Our newsletterAcademicarXiv, 10 Oct 2026
Made-up brands that kept neutral copy got zero AI recommendations once rivals used authority-style copy (0 of 1,414 trials)
Optimisation methods
0
recommendations went to non-optimized skincare challenger brands across 1,414 valid trials once competitors used GEO in the source's multi-brand test
- Reader Note:
- This is from Experiment 3 in skincare. It covers scenarios where some made-up brands used GEO (generative engine optimization, i.e. copy written to win AI recommendations) and others kept neutral descriptions. Here, GEO means moderate authority wording (clinical and expert claims). The 1,414 trials are all valid single-recommendation trials in which at least one non-optimized made-up brand was in the list. Statistically, the paper puts the true rate at no more than 0.26%. The authority copy used made-up clinical claims, so the effect is an upper bound rather than a typical real-world result. The report does not say when the experiments were run.
- Evidence:
- Experimental
- Vendor interest:
- None
- Sample:
- Controlled prompt experiments on 3 commercial LLMs (GPT-4o-mini, Claude Sonnet, Gemini 3 Flash), mainly using skincare product sets with 1 real brand and 9 fictional brands; prompts run in English and Chinese with 20–30 repetitions per cell. Main analyses include 14,395 valid trials in Experiment 1, 3,854 valid calls in Experiment 2, and 4,745 valid calls in Experiment 3.
Reader Note:
Evidence:
Vendor interest:
Sample:Good for
Backing budget and pricing decisions in similar situations.
Not for
- Situations far from the one tested, without checking again.
- The source never says when this data was collected. It could be considerably older than the publication date suggests.
Related cards
Idea
Go deeper on this topic
Our Substack turns the data behind these cards into full breakdowns: what changed, why, and what to do about it.
Trend