Our newsletterAcademicarXiv, 10 Oct 2026
When specs were identical, AI models recommended the well-known skincare brand over nine made-up rivals in 100% of trials
Optimisation methods
100%
of valid trials recommended the real skincare brand when all 10 products had identical specs in the source's baseline test
- Reader Note:
- This is from Experiment 1a. Each 10-product list had one real brand and nine made-up brands. All products had identical rating, price, review count and ingredient description, plus a neutral product description. GPT-4o-mini, Claude Sonnet and Gemini 3 Flash were asked in English and Chinese to recommend one product. A fair share in a 10-product list would be 10%. Instead, the real brand was picked in all 670 valid trials, across all three models, both languages and four skincare categories (moisturizer, BHA exfoliant, sunscreen, cleanser). The report does not say when the experiments were run.
- Evidence:
- Experimental
- Vendor interest:
- None
- Sample:
- Controlled prompt experiments on 3 commercial LLMs (GPT-4o-mini, Claude Sonnet, Gemini 3 Flash), mainly using skincare product sets with 1 real brand and 9 fictional brands; prompts run in English and Chinese with 20–30 repetitions per cell. Main analyses include 14,395 valid trials in Experiment 1, 3,854 valid calls in Experiment 2, and 4,745 valid calls in Experiment 3.
Reader Note:
Evidence:
Vendor interest:
Sample:Good for
Backing budget and pricing decisions in similar situations.
Not for
- Situations far from the one tested, without checking again.
- The source never says when this data was collected. It could be considerably older than the publication date suggests.
Related cards
Idea
Go deeper on this topic
Our Substack turns the data behind these cards into full breakdowns: what changed, why, and what to do about it.
Trend