Vendor reportGraphite and Similarweb, 2026
B2B SaaS takes the biggest share of US ChatGPT ad impressions at 19.9%
Channel mix & planning
| Category | Share of ad impressions (%) | Number of advertisers (count) |
|---|---|---|
| B2B SaaS | 19.9% | 1,210 |
| Retail & Consumer Brands | 10.4% | 1,510 |
| Business & Professional Services | 8.5% | 2,231 |
| Career & Employment | 5.5% | 104 |
| Developer Tools & Infrastructure | 4.6% | 339 |
| Education & Training | 4.3% | 414 |
| Ecommerce & Website Platforms | 4% | 76 |
| Finance & Insurance | 3.8% | 222 |
| Travel & Hospitality | 3.5% | 232 |
| Electronics & Hardware | 3.4% | 198 |
| Affiliate & Comparison Sites | 3.1% | 59 |
| AI Tools & Platforms | 3.1% | 267 |
| Design & Creative Tools | 3.1% | 95 |
| Industrial & Business Supply | 2.5% | 473 |
| News & Publishing | 2% | 88 |
| Local Services | 1.6% | 662 |
| Cybersecurity | 1.6% | 32 |
| Automotive | 1.6% | 249 |
Share of ChatGPT ad impressions by category, with advertiser counts (US)
- Reader Note:
- Figure shows share of ChatGPT ad impressions by advertiser category among top US advertisers from March 30 to August 4, 2026, using Similarweb data with Graphite's advertiser taxonomy. B2B SaaS leads at 19.9% with 1,210 advertisers, ahead of Retail & Consumer Brands at 10.4% with 1,510 advertisers and Business & Professional Services at 8.5% with 2,231 advertisers. Impression share is not the same as advertiser count, so a category can have fewer advertisers but a larger share of impressions.
- Evidence:
- Observed behaviour
- Vendor interest:
- Moderate — This comes from a company with a commercial interest in this market, so it is not a neutral source.
- Sample:
- Similarweb user panel across 9 live ChatGPT ad markets (panel size not disclosed), plus Graphite analysis of 95k+ US ChatGPT ads from 500+ advertisers, 70k+ creatives, 50k+ headlines, and 8k+ landing pages from April to mid-August 2026.
Good for
Comparing yourself against a similar segment, and choosing what to test next.
Not for
- Saying that one thing caused another, or predicting what you would get.
- This comes from a company with a commercial interest in this market, so it is not a neutral source.
- The source says how much it looked at, but not how any of it was chosen.




