Vendor reportLater, 15 Oct 2025
77% of brands say AI-assisted influencer campaigns perform better
Workflow & automation
Share of brands reporting better, same, or worse campaign performance with AI-assisted influencer campaigns
- Better results77%
- Same results18%
- Worse/don't know5%
| Outcome | Share of brands (%) |
|---|---|
| Better results | 77% |
| Same results | 18% |
| Worse/don't know | 5% |
- Reader Note:
- This figure splits responses into better results, same results, or worse/don't know for AI-assisted influencer campaigns versus traditional approaches. The article text also says 37% saw "much better" results, but that breakdown is not shown in the figure. All results are self-reported by existing AI users, not measured campaign lift from an experiment.
- Evidence:
- Self-reported behaviour
- Vendor interest:
- High — This comes from a company with a commercial interest in this market, so it is not a neutral source.
- Sample:
- Survey of 189 influencer marketing decision-makers at CPG brands with more than $5M ARR who had used AI in influencer marketing in the past 12 months; conducted in September 2025.
Good for
A rough sense of size and direction, and deciding what to look at first.
Not for
- Exact numbers, or saying that one thing caused another.
- The two groups were not split at random — they picked their own side. The difference may have been there before anything was measured.
- This comes from a company with a commercial interest in this market, so it is not a neutral source.
- This is an aggregated or average number that covers very different cases. Real results in a particular segment may differ.




