Skip to content
Vendor reportLater, 15 Oct 2025

77% of brands say AI-assisted influencer campaigns perform better

Workflow & automation



Share of brands reporting better, same, or worse campaign performance with AI-assisted influencer campaigns

  • Better results77%
  • Same results18%
  • Worse/don't know5%
Share of brands reporting better, same, or worse campaign performance with AI-assisted influencer campaigns
OutcomeShare of brands (%)
Better results77%
Same results18%
Worse/don't know5%
Reader Note:
This figure splits responses into better results, same results, or worse/don't know for AI-assisted influencer campaigns versus traditional approaches. The article text also says 37% saw "much better" results, but that breakdown is not shown in the figure. All results are self-reported by existing AI users, not measured campaign lift from an experiment.
Evidence:
Self-reported behaviour
Vendor interest:
High — This comes from a company with a commercial interest in this market, so it is not a neutral source.
Sample:
Survey of 189 influencer marketing decision-makers at CPG brands with more than $5M ARR who had used AI in influencer marketing in the past 12 months; conducted in September 2025.

Good for

A rough sense of size and direction, and deciding what to look at first.

Not for

  • Exact numbers, or saying that one thing caused another.
  • The two groups were not split at random — they picked their own side. The difference may have been there before anything was measured.
  • This comes from a company with a commercial interest in this market, so it is not a neutral source.
  • This is an aggregated or average number that covers very different cases. Real results in a particular segment may differ.

Coming soon

This feature isn’t available yet.