Journal of Consumer Research (2025) — Experience, confidence, and consumer choice
Original study- Publisher
- Journal of Consumer Research
- Evidence:
- Observed behaviour
- Vendor interest:
- None
- Sample:
- Multimethod source: 1,046,922 wine notes from 30,141 CellarTracker users; 1,451,766 BeerAdvocate reviews from 32,563 users; 984,573 RateBeer reviews from 19,679 users; 229,267 Sephora reviews from 11,994 users with at least 10 reviews; plus an experiment with 801 Mechanical Turk participants.
- Methodology
- Disclosed
- Geography
- US
- Data period
- 01.01.1996 – 31.12.2022
- Published
- 2025
Summary:
This paper examines how consumer confidence shifts with experience and how that shapes what people choose next.
It argues confidence often follows a U-shape: high at first, lower once people realize how much they don’t know, then higher again as expertise builds. It also tests whether lower confidence makes people switch products or brands.
Rocklage, Berger, and Boghrati (Journal of Consumer Research) analyze large-scale review data — about 1.0M wine notes, 1.45M BeerAdvocate reviews, ~985K RateBeer reviews, and ~229K Sephora reviews — tracking each user over time.
They use the Certainty Lexicon to score how confident reviews sound, model changes across experience, and run experiments (including a repeated photo-rating task with 801 MTurk participants) plus confidence manipulations.
Results consistently show the U-shaped confidence curve across categories and methods.
When confidence dips, people are more likely to change what they pick next: in wine/beer they choose less similar options; in beer they switch brands/styles and take longer to return; in cosmetics they switch brands within a subcategory. More analytical processing is linked to faster confidence recovery.
Key limitations: confidence is inferred from language, reviewers are self-selected, and review count is only a proxy for true experience. Experiments provide the clearest causal evidence; review analyses are strong observational support.