Our newsletterAcademicarXiv, 11 Sep 2026
A brand's mention rate in AI answers differs by model, by language and by question type, so one overall visibility figure is not enough
Citation & visibility tracking
- Reader Note:
- Only one brand was tracked, so the paper shows that the spread exists, not how large it is for anyone else. It is also a measure of where a brand gets mentioned, not of how good any model is.
- Evidence:
- Observed behaviour
- Vendor interest:
- Low
- Sample:
- Main evidence is simulation-based. The paper also collected 2,240 complete AI answers from two GPT models answering 56 product-recommendation questions in English and Japanese, with 20 repeated answers per question-model pair.
Reader Note:
Evidence:
Vendor interest:
Sample:Good for
Getting a rough orientation, and deciding what to check yourself.
Not for
- Saying that one thing caused another, or predicting what you would get.
- This is one case — one company, one campaign, one account. Nothing implies it happens anywhere else.
Related cards
Citation & visibility trackingTrend
Only 12% of links cited by AI assistants show up in Google's top 10 search results for the same prompt
TrendCitation & visibility trackingTrend
When ChatGPT cites webpages, nearly 90% rank below 21st in GoogleCitation & visibility trackingIdea
In Fashion, AI use cases are spread evenly, with personal styling slightly ahead
Idea
Go deeper on this topic
Our Substack turns the data behind these cards into full breakdowns: what changed, why, and what to do about it.
Citation & visibility trackingTrend
Reddit's share of citations in ChatGPT Search dropped from a steady 3.83% to 0.52% between August 7 and August 17, an 86.4% fall in ten daysCitation & visibility trackingTrend
Open full graphOnly about 17% of AI Overview citations also rank in the organic top 10, while just over half are somewhere in the top 100.
Citation & visibility trackingTrend
About 80% of AI assistant citations do not rank anywhere in Google for the original query