Skip to content

For facts, ChatGPT fan-out queries go to official brand sites, while for opinions and product reviews, they favor Reddit and review platforms.

Citation & visibility tracking


Reader Note:
This is the author's reading of what she observed rather than a measured split, and no shares are attached to any of the routes. The piece sets them out in more detail: Reddit, including specific subreddits, for opinions and product reviews; .gov and sometimes .org for health and legal questions; the brand's own site for specs and pricing.
Evidence:
Expert judgment
Vendor interest:
Low
Sample:
Mixed and not standardized. The article combines the author's own observations with third-party studies, including about 4,000 prompts in one cited dataset, 27 conversations and 3,554 retrieved pages in another, and roughly 20 prompts in one of the author's examples.

Good for

Hearing how someone who knows the field reads it, and deciding what to check yourself.

Not for

  • Anything that needs a measurement. Nobody counted or tested this.
  • This is an aggregated or average number that covers very different cases. Real results in a particular segment may differ.
  • The source says how much it looked at, but not how any of it was chosen.
  • The source never says how this number was measured.

Coming soon

This feature isn’t available yet.