Skip to content
Vendor reportMotion, 2026

Testing more ad variants leads advertisers to find more breakout winners, not just sharper intuition

Creatives


Spend Tier (per month)Average Testing Volume (per week)Average Hit Rate (%)
Micro (<$10K)2.84.03%
Small ($10K-$50K)4.16.47%
Medium ($50K-$200K)6.678.13%
Large ($200K-$1M)11.248.64%
Enterprise ($1M+)18.858.8%

Meta ads: ads tested per week and hit rate, by advertiser spend tier (count, %)

Reader Note:
The mechanism the report gives is arithmetic rather than skill: more ads tested means more chances of hitting an exceptional one, and it says plainly that volume “doesn't make the average ad better”. A lower hit rate at a larger advertiser can therefore mean heavier testing rather than worse creative. A winner here is Motion's own threshold — an ad that spent at least ten times its account's median — so this measures where Meta concentrated budget, not sales or profit.
Evidence:
Observed behaviour
Vendor interest:
High — This comes from a company with a commercial interest in this market, so it is not a neutral source.
Sample:
An anonymized dataset of 550,000+ Facebook and Instagram ads from 6,000+ advertisers, representing about $1.3 billion in spend.

Good for

Comparing yourself against a similar segment, and choosing what to test next.

Not for

  • Saying that one thing caused another, or predicting what you would get.
  • This comes from a company with a commercial interest in this market, so it is not a neutral source.
  • The source talks about this as cause and effect — that is its reading, not a finding.
  • This is an aggregated or average number that covers very different cases. Real results in a particular segment may differ.
  • The source says how much it looked at, but not how any of it was chosen.

Coming soon

This feature isn’t available yet.