Creative Benchmarks (Motion) — Meta ad testing, winners, and creative formats

Vendor report

Publisher: Motion
Evidence:: Observed behaviour
Vendor interest:: High
Sample:: An anonymized dataset of 550,000+ Facebook and Instagram ads from 6,000+ advertisers, representing about $1.3 billion in spend.
Methodology: Disclosed
Geography: Global
Data period: 01.09.2025 – 31.01.2026
Published: 2026

Summary:

This report looks at how often Meta ads actually become winners and what that means for creative testing.

It was published by Motion, a creative analytics company that sells tools for analyzing ad formats, hooks, and assets. The report pushes teams to plan around testing volume instead of trying to predict which single ad will work, and that approach fits the product Motion sells. The goal is to give benchmarks for testing volume, hit rates (the percentage of account ads that becomes winners), and the formats, hooks, and assets behind winning ads.

Motion analyzed an anonymized dataset of more than 550,000 Facebook and Instagram ads from more than 6,000 advertisers, tied to about $1.3 billion in spend. The ads launched between September 2025 and early January 2026, covering the holiday run-up, Black Friday/Cyber Monday, and the post-holiday period. The analysis is based on observed ad-spend patterns. It is not a survey or an experiment. Motion counts an ad as a winner if it spent at least 10 times its account's median ad spend.

Key insights:
• Only about 5% of ads reached the winner threshold, and roughly half got little or no spend.
• Larger advertisers found more winners mainly because they tested more ads. A lower hit rate can simply reflect heavier testing.
• Mid-range ads that never break out still absorbed meaningful spend and helped keep accounts stable.
• Offer-first banners and demos were the most widely used formats at scale. Unboxing, POV, behind-the-scenes, and founder ads had higher winner rates but less spend overall.
• Urgency, offers, price framing, and newness were the strongest hooks in this holiday-heavy sample.
• Text-only ads, product images with text, and UGC-style assets did well in the winner tables. Motion links this to how quickly these assets can be produced and tested.

Margin notes:
This is a vendor report from a company selling the kind of creative analytics the report argues for, so vendor interest is high. The time window is short and unusually seasonal, which likely boosts offer-led and urgency-based creative. The report measures spend concentration on the platform, not sales or profit, so a winner here means an ad Meta spent heavily on under Motion's own rule.

of Meta ads reach winner status by scaling to at least 10× their account’s median spend in Q4 2025 – Q1 2026

Unboxing, offer-first banner and behind-the-scenes creatives had the highest winner rates among Meta visual formats

Meta ads: hit rate by visual format (% of ads that became top performers)
Visual format	Winners — top performing ads (count)	Mid-range — average performing ads (count)
Unboxing	1,229	5,295
Offer-first banner	11,006	39,448
Behind the scenes	772	2,989
Founder	692	4,961
POV	792	3,831

Open full graph

Broad lifestyle statements and vague benefit claims are less common among winner ads

In technology Meta ads, the highest winner rates came from letter, slideshow and live auction creatives

Technology: hit rate by visual format (% of ads that became top performers)
Visual format	Hit rate (%)
Letter	17.57%
Slideshow	15.22%
Live auction	14.81%
Unboxing	13.33%
Before and after	13.21%

In beauty & personal care Meta ads, the highest winner rates came from trend, letter and stop motion creatives

Beauty & personal care: hit rate by visual format (% of ads that became top performers)
Visual format	Hit rate (%)
Trend	12.32%
Letter	12.27%
Stop motion	11.98%
Founder	11.49%
Duet	11.11%

In fitness & sports Meta ads, the highest winner rates came from post it, trend and countdown creatives

Fitness & sports: hit rate by visual format (% of ads that became top performers)
Visual format	Hit rate (%)
Post it	20%
Trend	14.08%
Countdown	12.5%
Unboxing	11.27%
Podcast	11.11%

In fashion & apparel Meta ads, the highest winner rates came from post it, quiz and stylized product shot

Fashion & apparel: hit rate by visual format (% of ads that became top performers)
Visual format	Hit rate (%)
Post it	27.4%
Quiz	25.99%
Stylized product shot	21.21%
Meme	17.28%
ASMR	15.09%

In health & wellness Meta ads, the highest winner rates came from stitch, reaction video and unboxing creatives

Health & wellness: hit rate by visual format (% of ads that became top performers)
Visual format	Hit rate (%)
Stitch	12.5%
Reaction video	11.24%
Unboxing	10.86%
Celebrity	10.35%
Founder	10.18%

In automotive Meta ads, the highest winner rates came from street interview, behind the scenes and meme creatives

Automotive: hit rate by visual format (% of ads that became top performers)
Visual format	Hit rate (%)
Street interview	30%
Behind the scenes	13.68%
Meme	9.52%
Greenscreen	8.33%
Headline	7.35%

Enterprise advertisers put 63.7% of their monthly Meta spend behind winning ads, against 23.0% at micro advertisers

Meta ads: share of monthly spend going to winners, mid-range and losers, by advertiser size (%)
Advertiser size	Losers (%)	Mid-range (%)	Winners (%)
Micro (<$10K)	31.5%	45.6%	23%
Small ($10K-$50K)	25.7%	39.7%	34.6%
Medium ($50K-200K)	18.6%	28.1%	53.3%
Large ($200K-1M)	17.1%	26.4%	56.5%
Enterprise ($1M+)	13.8%	22.4%	63.7%

Testing more ad variants leads advertisers to find more breakout winners, not just sharper intuition

Meta ads: ads tested per week and hit rate, by advertiser spend tier (count, %)
Spend Tier (per month)	Average Testing Volume (per week)	Average Hit Rate (%)
Micro (<$10K)	2.8	4.03%
Small ($10K-$50K)	4.1	6.47%
Medium ($50K-$200K)	6.67	8.13%
Large ($200K-$1M)	11.24	8.64%
Enterprise ($1M+)	18.85	8.8%

The share of Meta ads that become winners rises with advertiser size, from 3.7% at micro advertisers to 8.2% at enterprises

Meta ads: share of ads that become winners, mid-range or losers, by advertiser size (%)
Advertiser size	Losers (%)	Mid-range (%)	Winners (%)
Micro (<$10K)	50.2%	46%	3.7%
Small ($10K-$50K)	49.3%	44.6%	6.2%
Medium ($50K-200K)	52.6%	40.1%	7.3%
Large ($200K-1M)	53.9%	38%	8.1%
Enterprise ($1M+)	52.2%	39.6%	8.2%

In pets Meta ads, the highest winner rates came from nostalgia, unconventional text placement and native search

Pets: hit rate by visual format (% of ads that became top performers)
Visual format	Hit rate (%)
Nostalgia	26.09%
Unconventional text placement	20.93%
Native search	18.52%
ASMR	18.42%
Sign	16.03%

In parenting & family Meta ads, the highest winner rates came from unboxing, expert explainer and cinematic b-roll creatives

Parenting & family: hit rate by visual format (% of ads that became top performers)
Visual format	Hit rate (%)
Expert explainer	25%
Unboxing	25.53%
Cinematic b-roll	21.88%
Founder	20%
Unformatted	17.31%

Open full graph

In professional services category, the highest winner rates on Meta ads came from notes app, grid swap and demo

Professional services: hit rate by visual format (% of ads that became top performers)
Visual format	Hit rate (%)
Notes app	16.67%
Grid swap	16.07%
Demo	12.5%
Screen recording	9.65%
UI mockup	8.82%

Open full graph

In entertainment & media Meta ads, the highest winner rates came from how to, reaction video and founder

Entertainment & media: hit rate by visual format (% of ads that became top performers)
Visual format	Hit rate (%)
How to	19.51%
Reaction video	15.38%
Founder	13.79%
Unconventional text placement	12.12%
Skit	10.26%

Open full graph

Text-only assets took nearly twice their share of Meta budget, while high-production assets got less than their share

Asset types: spend use ratio (share of spend ÷ share of ads)
Asset type	Share of creatives (%)	Share of spend (%)
Text only	2.57%	5.07%
Product image with text	12.35%	15.2%
Illustration	3.68%	3.93%
UGC	26.01%	26.03%
Lifestyle - product image with text	8.88%	8.82%

Open full graph

In travel & hospitality Meta ads, the highest winner rates came from how to, greenscreen and asmr creatives

Travel & hospitality: hit rate by visual format (% of ads that became top performers)
Visual format	Hit rate (%)
How to	16.67%
Greenscreen	14.29%
ASMR	13.64%
Grid swap	13.16%
Founder	12.5%

Text-only assets had the highest hit rate of any asset type at 11.60%, ahead of product images with text at 8.75% and UGC at 7.56%

Asset types: hit rate (% of ads that became top performers)
Asset type	Winners — top performing ads (count)	Mid-range — average performing ads (count)
Text only	1,728	4,766
Product image with text	6,256	29,402
Lifestyle-product image	24	186
UGC	11,374	60,699
High production	2,653	15,812

Open full graph

Newness, sale announcements and price anchors had the highest hit rates among Meta hook headline tactics

Hook headline tactics: hit rate (% of ads that became top performers)
Hook headline tactics	Winners (top performing ads)	Mid-range (avg performing ads)
Newness	83	498
Sale announcement	16	29
Price anchor	71	255
Urgency	4,855	13,497
Announcement	37	229

Open full graph

Within every spend tier the top quarter of advertisers ship between 1.7 and 2.9 times more creative per week than the average advertiser in that same tier

In finance Meta ads, the highest winner rates came from social proof mashup, unconventional text placement and letter creatives

Finance: hit rate by visual format (% of ads that became top performers)
Visual format	Hit rate (%)
Social proof mashup	20%
Unconventional text placement	14.81%
Letter	13.16%
Skit	12.18%
Trend	11.73%

Open full graph

In home & lifestyle Meta ads, the highest winner rates came from reaction video, social proof mashup and letter creatives

Home & lifestyle: hit rate by visual format (% of ads that became top performers)
Visual format	Hit rate (%)
Reaction video	22.54%
Social proof mashup	18.78%
Letter	17.97%
Trend	17.59%
Unconventional text placement	17.02%

Open full graph

UGC produced the largest number of winning Meta ads at 11,374, but only because it is the most used asset type; on hit rate it ranks fourth

Asset types: number of winning Meta ads (count)
Asset type	Winners — top performing ads (count)	Mid-range — average performing ads (count)
UGC	11,374	60,699
Lifestyle image with text	8,769	62,631
Product image with text	6,256	29,402
Lifestyle-product image with text	3,173	22,533
High production	2,653	15,812

Open full graph

In food & nutrition Meta ads, the highest winner rates came from letter, countdown and unconventional text placement creatives

Food & nutrition: hit rate by visual format (% of ads that became top performers)
Visual format	Hit rate (%)
Letter	17.9%
Countdown	16.67%
Unconventional text placement	15.91%
Time lapse	15.15%
Infographic	13.75%

Open full graph

In education Meta ads, the highest winner rates came from celebrity, text message and unconventional text placement creatives

Education: hit rate by visual format (% of ads that became top performers)
Visual format	Hit rate (%)
Celebrity	14.68%
Text message	11.28%
Unconventional text placement	11.11%
Feature benefit pointout	10.42%
Letter	9.22%

Open full graph

Creative Benchmarks (Motion) — Meta ad testing, winners, and creative formats

Summary:

Cards from this research