Skip to content

The State of Influencer Marketing 2026 (Aspire)

Original study
Vendor report
Publisher
Aspire
Evidence:
Self-reported behaviour
Vendor interest:
High
Sample:
Mixed methods: Aspire internal platform data from creators and campaigns, plus surveys of nearly 900 marketers and creators; exact split and sampling method not disclosed.
Methodology
Disclosed
Geography
Global
Data period
01.01.2025 – 31.12.2025
Published
2026

Summary:

This report from Aspire, an influencer marketing platform that sells software and agency services to brands, looks at influencer marketing going into 2026: budgets, channels, creator pricing, campaign results, AI use and paid media.

The report combines Aspire's internal platform data for 2025 (campaign, content and performance data from creators who connect their social accounts) with surveys of nearly 900 marketers and creators. The split between the two groups and the survey dates are not given. Most surveyed brands are SMBs (74%) running programs in-house (67%). Most surveyed creators are nano creators (63%) whose main channel is Instagram (68%). A few market-size figures come from outside projections.

Key findings:
• Most marketers plan bigger budgets. 74% plan to increase influencer budgets in 2026. In 2025, brands put 23% of their marketing budget into influencer marketing on average.
• Instagram and TikTok lead. 92% of brands plan to use Instagram most in 2026 and 69% TikTok. TikTok campaign volume on Aspire grew 189% year over year. Creators lean into YouTube more than brands do (41% vs 25%).
• Smaller creators get more engagement. Average engagement is 6.29% for nano creators vs 1.80% for mega creators. 54% of brands mostly work with nano and micro creators, and 32% with mid-tier.
• Cheaper reach, slightly bigger campaigns. Average CPM was $2.68, down 42% year over year. The average campaign had 360 posts, and spend rose 11% to $30.2K, while spend per creator fell 28% to $1.3K.
• Brands are split on what drives ROI. Ambassador programs (24%), UGC in paid ads (23%) and one-off campaigns (22%) were named almost equally. Among creators, 63% prefer long-term partnerships.
• Creator content feeds paid media. 77% of marketers reuse creator content in paid social and 69% say it performs better than their other creative. Meta Partnership Ads run through Aspire averaged 2.4x ROAS.
• AI is widely used, AI influencers are not. 59% of marketers use AI in influencer marketing and 49% of creators use it for content creation, but 89% of marketers won't work with AI-generated influencers.
• TikTok Shop is growing. 32% of brands already sell there (up from 17% last year) and 25% plan to start soon.

Margin notes:
This is a vendor report: platform figures come from Aspire's own customers, the survey leans toward small brands and nano creators, and the report ends with a pitch for Aspire's products.

Cards from this research

Shortlisting creatorsTrend

40% of creators say values alignment is the top factor when choosing brands

40% of creators say values alignment is the top factor when choosing brands
Performance measurementTrend

Brands are split on which influencer strategy drives the most ROI: ambassador programs 24%, UGC in paid ads 23%, one-off campaigns 22%

Brands are split on which influencer strategy drives the most ROI: ambassador programs 24%, UGC in paid ads 23%, one-off campaigns 22%
Budget allocationTrend

61% of brands plan to spend up to $250K on influencer marketing in 2026. The most popular budget tier is $50K-$250K

61% of brands plan to spend up to $250K on influencer marketing in 2026. The most popular budget tier is $50K-$250K
Budget allocationTrend

Pinterest has the lowest average CPM for influencer campaigns at $0.01

Pinterest has the lowest average CPM for influencer campaigns at $0.01
Budget allocationTrend

67% of brands say usage rights are included in the creator's initial contract or rate

67% of brands say usage rights are included in the creator's initial contract or rate
Shortlisting creatorsTrend

Brands most often work with mid-tier creators (32%), nano creators (27%), or micro creators (27%)

Brands most often work with mid-tier creators (32%), nano creators (27%), or micro creators (27%)
Channel validationTrend

YouTube has the highest cost per engagement by social channel

YouTube has the highest cost per engagement by social channel
Shortlisting creatorsTrend

Engagement rate is highest for nano creators at 6.29% and drops to 1.80% for mega creators

Engagement rate is highest for nano creators at 6.29% and drops to 1.80% for mega creators
Budget allocationTrend

27% of creators say they typically charge less than $500 for paid usage rights

27% of creators say they typically charge less than $500 for paid usage rights

Coming soon

This feature isn’t available yet.